Types of the best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an aggressive campaign to gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs when it comes to Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an Indian district. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to bring back self-government and control over land and resources represents a”recover that is significant of space.” Equally significant is exactly what happened once that space was recovered.

The topic of this paper addresses an understudied and period that is essential the annals associated with Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a growing body of literature from the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time scale between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks because the Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the fight to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, as well as the grouped community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power inside the political and landscape that is physical reclaim their meetinghouse and also the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking Mashpee community identity. This research examines legislative reports, petitions, letters, and legal documents to create a narrative of Native agency when you look at the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation together with Evolving Community Identity within the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to public venues: Local Actors in addition to Creation of National Parklands within the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and non-governmental organizations in the development of parklands for the American South. While current historiography primarily credits the federal government with all the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders, a study of parklands in the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the significance of local and non-government sources for the preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the significance of a national bureaucracy setting the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but focus on opposition to the imposition of the latest rules governing land when confronted with some outside threat. In spite of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative, the necessity of local individuals within the development of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history. Several examples within the American South raise concerns about the traditional narrative pitting governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained interest in both nature preservation and in creating spaces for public recreation during the local level, and finds that the “private way to public parks” merits further investigation.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks within the American South” was subsequently selected for publication in the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced an abundant literature in regards to the Levellers and their role into the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily focused on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to give the franchise and espousal of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a sect that is fragmented of radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility which they might make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to discover a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their ideas that are religious. Rather than concentrating on John Lilburne, often taken once the public face for the Leveller movement, this paper will concentrate on the equally intriguing and a lot more thinker that is consistent William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement within the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, i really hope to declare that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism when confronted with violent sectarians who sought to wield control of the Church of England. Even though the Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s dedication to a tolerant society and a secular state shouldn’t be minimized but instead recognized as section of a more substantial debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to play a role in the historiography that is rich of toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: a full case Study regarding the First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have never only proliferated rapidly–they have grown to be the normative expectation within American society. For the the greater part of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have led to no memory that is permanent additionally the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the city while the nation could your investment tragedy and move on. All of this changed may 29, 1989 once the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial into the thirteen people killed in the”post that is infamous shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the situation of Edmond to be able to realize why it became the first memory site for this kind in united states of america history. I argue that the tiny town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time associated with shooting, coupled with the near total community involvement established ideal conditions when it comes to emergence with this unique form of memory site. I also conduct a historiography of the usage of “the ribbon” in order to illustrate how it has get to be the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society into the late century that is 20th. Lastly, I illustrate the way the lack that is notable of between people involved in the Edmond and Oklahoma City cases after the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity among these cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising wide range of aesthetic similarities why these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The search for Postmortem Identity through the Pax Romana”

“If you would like know who I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription. The Romans dealt with death in lots of ways which incorporated a selection of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as with the full case regarding the “ash and embers.” The romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained by the turn of the first century of this era. Cremation vanished essay writer by the next century, replaced by the practice of the distant past by the century that is fifth. Burial first began to take hold when you look at the western Roman Empire through the early second century, using the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites through the Roman world would not discuss the practices of cremation and burial at length. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in type of burial vessels such as urns and sarcophagi represented the only place to move to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the Roman world. This paper analyzed a tiny corpus of such vessels so that you can identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of these symbols into the fragments of text available associated with death in the Roman world. The analysis concluded that the transition to inhumantion was a movement caused by an increased desire on the right part of Romans to preserve identity in death during and after the Pax Romana.